Rockefeller IV (former Governor of West Virginia, now US Senator) Cyrus Vance (Secretary of State under President Carter) Eugene Black (former President of the World Bank) Joseph Johnson (former President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace) Gen. Anderson (former Chairman, Atlantic Richfield Co., and Chairman, Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies) John D. Nitze (former representative of Schroeder Bank Nitze played a very prominent role in matters of arms control agreements, which have always been under the direction of the RIIA) Robert O. Kennan (former US Ambassador to the Soviet Union) Paul H. McCloy (former President of Chase Manhattan Bank) George F. Bundy (former President of the Ford Foundation, and former editor of the Council on Foreign Relations’ Foreign Affairs journal) John J. McNamara (President Kennedy’s Secretary of Defense and former President of the World Bank) William P. Hughes (former President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace) Robert S. Fulbright (from Arkansas, a Rhodes Scholar) Dean Acheson (Secretary of State under President Truman) Nelson Rockefeller and Laurance Rockefeller former President Gerald Ford Henry J. Those who have attended Bilderberg Group meetings over the years and flouted the Logan Act include: Allen Dulles (CIA) Senator William J. However, there have been a number of judicial references to the Act, and it is not uncommon for it to be used as a political weapon. The Logan Act was intended to prohibit United States citizens without authority from interfering in relations between the United States and foreign governments. While the name Chatham House is commonly used to refer to the Institute itself, the Royal Institute of International Affairs is the foreign policy executive arm of the British monarchy.Īccording to RIIA procedures: „When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed nor may it be mentioned that the information was received at a meeting of the Institute.“ The idea is to give to each country a political constitution and an appropriate national economic structure, organised for the following purposes: (1) to place political power into the hands of chosen people and eliminate all intermediaries (2) to establish a maximum concentration of industries and suppress all unwarranted competition (3) to establish absolute control of prices of all goods and raw materials (Bilderbergers make it possible through their iron-grip control of The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization) and (4) to create judicial and social institutions that would prevent all extremes of action.Īlthough participants emphatically attest that they attend the Club’s annual meeting as private citizens and not in their official government capacity, that affirmation is dubious-particularly when you compare the Chatham House Rule with the Logan Act in the United States, where it is absolutely illegal for elected officials to meet in private with influential business executives to debate and design public policy.īilderberg meetings follow a traditional protocol founded in 1919, in the wake of the Paris Peace Conference held at Versailles, by the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) based at Chatham House in London. Amongst this year’s luminaries in attendance were: Henry Kissinger Henry Kravis of KKR Marie-Josée Kravis of Hudson Institute Vernon Jordan Etienne Davignon, Bilderberg Group President Her Majesty Queen Beatrix of The Netherlands, daughter of one of the founders, Prince Bernhard and the King and Queen of Spain.Īs a rhetorical question, can someone please explain to me how it is that progressive liberals such as John Edwards and Hillary Clinton as well as do-gooder humanitarians with multiple social projects on the go, such as David Rockefeller and every Royal House in Europe, can perennially attend Bilderberg meetings knowing that the final objective of this despicable group of hoodlums is a fascist One World Empire? How could it be orchestrated? After a sumptuous lunch on this warm and sunny 3rd June, most Bilderbergers returned to their countries of choice, freshly armed with precise instructions from the Steering Committee on how to proceed in covertly expanding the powers of One World Government. Discussions at the 2007 Bilderberg Group meetings covered concerns over the World Bank presidency, Russia’s muscle-flexing on energy issues and the failure of US-led NATO forces in Afghanistan.Įxtracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 14, Number 5 (August – September 2007)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |